Microsoft Fabric and Azure
Written By: Sajagan Thirugnanam and Austin Levine
Last Updated on October 2, 2025
Microsoft Fabric has become the default short-list option for data and analytics leaders who are tired of stitching together lake, warehouse, orchestration, ML, and BI with brittle glue. If you own outcomes for finance, operations, or commercial analytics, the question isn’t “what is Fabric?” anymore—it’s whether it fits your operating model, governance posture, and cost constraints better than your current stack.
This article analyses when Fabric is a good bet, the trade-offs against common alternatives, and what to check before you commit capacity.
Quick answer: Choose Microsoft Fabric if you want an integrated lakehouse, warehouse, and BI platform with first-class governance, OneLake as a single data foundation, and Power BI performance via Direct Lake. It reduces tool sprawl and handoffs, accelerates delivery with a unified UX and security model, and centralises cost to capacity. If you already standardised on Power BI, Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD), and Azure, Fabric will likely lower time-to-value and total risk.
Table of contents
What Microsoft Fabric is
How it works (architecture in plain English)
When Fabric makes sense
Decision guide: Fabric vs common alternatives
Implementation guide
Performance, capacity, and cost
Governance and security considerations
Common pitfalls
FAQs
Glossary
Closing
What Microsoft Fabric is
Microsoft Fabric is an end-to-end analytics platform that unifies data engineering, data science, real-time analytics, data warehousing, and business intelligence on a single Software-as-a-Service layer. It brings together OneLake (a single, tenant-wide data lake), Lakehouse and Warehouse workloads, Data Factory pipelines and notebooks, Real-Time Intelligence, and Power BI for consumption—all governed under one admin plane and licensed by capacity.
Key concepts you’ll meet early:
OneLake: Central storage for all Fabric items using open formats (Delta/Parquet), with shortcuts for virtualised access to external sources.
Direct Lake for Power BI: Datasets query Delta Lake files directly, eliminating import refresh and reducing latency without a heavy DirectQuery tax.
Unified security and governance: Fabric authenticates with Microsoft Entra ID, supports item-level permissions, and integrates with Microsoft Purview (Purview hub) for governance, catalog, and lineage for supported items.
How it works (architecture in plain English)
Fabric runs as a SaaS layer on Azure, abstracting compute and storage complexity behind capacities. Provision an F-SKU Fabric capacity and assign workspaces to it for Fabric workloads (pipelines, Spark, SQL endpoints, etc.). Power BI content can also run on P-SKU capacities. All workloads within scope consume the shared capacity.
Data lives in OneLake. Lakehouses store data in Delta format; Warehouses expose a SQL endpoint with T-SQL semantics for structured workloads. Power BI semantic models can read Delta via Direct Lake, avoiding regular data reloads; models may fall back to DirectQuery in some cases. Shortcuts let you reference external data in place, reducing copies.
Governance sits on top: central administration for regions, capacities, tenant settings, data loss prevention, and Purview integration for cataloguing, lineage, and policies. Git integration supports Dev/Test/Prod branching for code-first assets.
When Fabric makes sense
Fabric is a strong fit when you already rely on Power BI and want to remove the semantic/refresh bottleneck; when you’re consolidating disparate Azure services (ADLS, Synapse, Data Factory, Databricks, Power BI) into one contract and admin plane; when finance and operations need trustworthy, governed metrics with short data-to-decision cycles; when you need near-real-time visibility without complex streaming infrastructure; and when you prefer open data formats (Delta/Parquet) to avoid lock-in or to interoperate with existing Spark/SQL tools.
It may be less ideal if your ML platform and MLOps are deeply standardised on non-Microsoft tooling with minimal Power BI usage; if you require strict private connectivity controls beyond defaults—review Trusted workspace access (GA), Fabric Private Link (tenant GA; workspace preview), and managed VNET for Spark (preview); or if your data estate is small, stable, and already cost-efficient on a single warehouse or a simple ELT + BI pattern.
Decision guide: Fabric vs common alternatives
Below is a pragmatic comparison across typical decision criteria. It’s directional; your priorities will vary by team, process, and compliance.
Criteria | Microsoft Fabric | “DIY Azure” (ADLS + Synapse/Databricks + ADF + Power BI) | Snowflake + dbt + BI | Databricks Lakehouse + BI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Integration & handoffs | High: unified UX, security, and capacity | Low–Medium: multiple services to glue and govern | Medium: strong core, multiple vendors to integrate | Medium–High for data/ML, BI still separate |
BI performance & semantics | Direct Lake eliminates refresh and reduces latency; native Power BI | Depends on model; imports and gateways common | Good with imports; live connections vary | Good; requires optimised connectors/semantics |
Governance & lineage | Centralised, Purview integration, item-level controls | Strong but fragmented across services | Strong in-product + partner tools | Strong for code assets; BI governance external |
Openness | Delta/Parquet in OneLake; shortcuts to external | Open if you enforce it | Open core; vendor-specific extras | Delta/Parquet standard |
Time-to-value | Fast: SaaS, templates, unified admin | Slower: provisioning, networking, CI/CD across services | Medium: mature ecosystem, vendor mix | Medium: strong notebooks/ML velocity |
TCO predictability | Capacity-based; consolidated | Varied across services; risk of idle/over-provision | Consumption-based; multi-contract | Consumption-based; plus BI capacity |
Fit for finance & operations | Strong: metrics + reports native | Varies; more integration effort | Strong warehouse pattern; BI varies | Strong for data platform; BI tuning needed |
If you run Power BI at scale or want to collapse your analytics supply chain, Fabric tends to win. If you’ve already invested heavily in non-Microsoft BI and ML stacks, quantify re-platforming costs.
Implementation guide
Target outcomes and scope
Define two or three business outcomes (for example, a daily margin bridge or OTIF in operations) and what must be true to trust them. Decide whether you will lead with Lakehouse + Direct Lake or Warehouse + semantic model.
Capacity and workspace strategy
Right-size an initial capacity for development and a smaller one for production burn-in. Map workspaces to domains (Finance, Supply Chain, Commercial) with clear RACI for owners, contributors, and consumers. See Licensing overview.
Use Fabric capacity (F-SKU) for Fabric workloads; align Power BI workspaces that rely on P-SKU accordingly.
Data landing and modelling
Establish OneLake zones (landing, bronze, silver, gold) with Delta as the standard. Use shortcuts for data you cannot move. Pick either a medallion-style lakehouse with curated tables or a Warehouse for highly structured SQL needs. See Lakehouse overview and Warehouse overview.
Semantic layer and consumption
For Power BI, prefer Direct Lake where feasible. Curate thin reports on top of governed semantic models. Apply row-level security and object-level security consistently.
DevOps and governance
Enable Git integration for versioning and promotion flows. Register assets in Purview, define data owners and stewards, and implement data loss prevention policies. Git integration overview.
Performance, capacity, and cost
Start with capacity baselining: instrument refresh and query durations, and watch capacity metrics before scaling. Avoid jumping SKUs based on one noisy workload.
Optimise for Direct Lake: partition large Delta tables by date or business keys; compact small files; maintain Z-order/clustering to reduce I/O.
Control workload mix: separate noisy engineering workloads from critical BI workspaces. Use pause/resume on Fabric (F-SKU) capacities for non-business hours where acceptable.
Reduce copies: use OneLake shortcuts for cross-domain access and eliminate redundant ETL chains that bloat storage and refresh windows.
Governance and security considerations
Identity and access: use Microsoft Entra groups and workspace roles; enforce least privilege. Keep sensitive datasets in dedicated workspaces with clear ownership.
Data protection: Apply RLS/OLS at the semantic layer (RLS applies to Viewer role in the service); use sensitivity labels and Purview DLP where appropriate. Align with Purview policies.
Lineage and cataloguing: register Fabric items in Purview, tagging owners, criticality, and data classifications. Monitor lineage from sources to reports.
Tenant and region strategy: standardise regions early. Consolidate capacities to simplify operations, but separate regulated workloads if required.
Change control: use Git-based CI/CD for code-first assets; adopt release checklists for Warehouse schema changes and semantic models.
Common pitfalls
Treating Fabric as “just Power BI” and not investing in data modelling and engineering standards.
Migrating “as-is” from legacy warehouses without redesigning for Delta/Direct Lake semantics.
Under-scoping governance; skipping Purview and ownership assignment, then backfilling under pressure.
Blending heavy Spark jobs and peak BI in one capacity, causing unpredictable latencies.
Ignoring file layout: small file fragmentation and missing partitioning degrade performance.
Over-building orchestration when Data Factory pipelines or event-driven patterns would suffice.
No cost guardrails: leaving sandboxes on large capacities with no pause policies.
FAQs
Do we need both Lakehouse and Warehouse in Fabric?
Not necessarily. Many enterprises start with a Lakehouse (Delta) for most domains and add a Warehouse for highly structured, SQL-heavy finance or supply chain workloads. The Warehouse offers familiar T-SQL and governed schemas; the Lakehouse brings flexibility and scale for semi-structured data. Both sit on OneLake and can feed the same semantic models.
How does Direct Lake differ from Import or DirectQuery in Power BI?
Import copies data into VertiPaq and needs scheduled refresh. DirectQuery queries the source, trading speed for real-time access. Direct Lake reads Delta files from OneLake with VertiPaq-style execution, avoids regular data copies, and can fall back to DirectQuery in certain conditions.
Can we keep some data outside OneLake?
Yes. Shortcuts let you reference data in external storage (e.g., ADLS) without copying, and Fabric can consume external data sources via pipelines or notebooks. The design intent is to reduce duplication while maintaining governance and lineage over both in-lake and external data.
How does Fabric handle real-time analytics?
The Real-Time Intelligence workload ingests and analyses event streams with low latency and can land curated data into OneLake for downstream models and reports. It simplifies the path from streaming to BI compared with assembling custom streaming stacks. See here.
What about vendor lock-in?
Fabric’s core storage is open (Delta/Parquet) and accessible. You can interoperate with Spark and other engines, and export curated datasets if needed. The semantic and orchestration layers are Microsoft-specific, but the data itself remains portable, which mitigates most lock-in risk.
How do we estimate capacity?
Start with a pilot on a modest capacity and measure: concurrent users, peak query durations, refresh/ingest windows, and Spark job profiles. Use metrics to scale predictably. Fabric licensing and capacity guidance is here. Avoid over-committing before understanding workload patterns.
Is Fabric suitable for regulated industries?
Fabric supports enterprise controls including data residency (home region, Multi-Geo), Conditional Access/Entra ID, sensitivity labels, Purview DLP (GA), and private connectivity options such as Trusted workspace access and Fabric Private Link. Validate these against your regulator’s requirements.
How does Fabric support CI/CD?
Git integration enables version control and deployments for code-first assets (notebooks, pipelines, SQL). Pair it with workspace promotion patterns and automated validation checks for semantic models. This brings standard software engineering practices to analytics without excessive custom tooling.
Closing
If Fabric aligns with your strategy—integrated, governed, and fast from data to decision—the next smart move is a targeted pilot tied to one or two measurable business outcomes. CaseWhen helps data and finance leaders de-risk that journey: capacity sizing, architecture patterns (Lakehouse vs Warehouse), Direct Lake readiness, and governance setup. If you want a concise readiness assessment or a two-week accelerator to prove value, get in touch.
Glossary
Microsoft Fabric: Microsoft’s end-to-end analytics SaaS platform covering data engineering, warehousing, data science, real-time, and BI.
OneLake: Tenant-wide data lake for Fabric assets, storing data in open Delta/Parquet formats.
Lakehouse: Fabric workload combining a data lake with managed tables and a SQL endpoint over Delta.
Warehouse: Fabric’s relational, T-SQL-centric workload for structured analytics with managed compute.
Direct Lake: Power BI mode that queries Delta files in OneLake with VertiPaq-style execution, avoiding regular data reloads and with possible DirectQuery fallback.
Capacity: The compute allocation (F/P SKU) that powers Fabric workspaces and workloads.
Shortcut: A virtual pointer in OneLake to external data, enabling in-place access without copying.
Purview: Microsoft’s data governance and catalog service that integrates with Fabric for lineage and policies.
Semantic model: The curated, governed data model that BI reports use, including measures and security.
Medallion architecture: Layered approach (bronze/silver/gold) for organising data quality and readiness in a lakehouse.
Microsoft Entra ID: Microsoft’s identity platform (formerly Azure AD) used for authentication and authorization in Fabric.
Real-Time Intelligence: Fabric workload for ingesting and analysing streaming/event data.
Related to Microsoft Fabric and Azure